Is this the Nobel Prize for property rights --- or for how genocide is the pre-condition for economic growth? Acemoglu Johnson & Robinson https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.91.5.1369 seem to argue that in those countries where colonial settlement having followed genocide in replacing the native aborigine, public institutions were set up mirroring those back home, thereby ensuring life expectancy outcomes for their descendants comparable to their own countries of origin. These were markedly superior to the populations of other countries where by contrast, insalubrious conditions having made settlement unattractive for European settlers, aborigine populations were allowed to survive. Yet since democratic representation & welfare measures towards that end were not considered necessary for subject peoples, the colonial powers employed such territories purely for the purpose of the extraction & the t...
Popular posts from this blog
Re Savarkar, Bakhle, Karnad, Modi Readers of LRB may be as puzzled as I have over the years whenever it carries something about India; or economics. It is difficult to make out Raghu Karnad’s point ( Raghu Karnad; Savarkar and the Making of Hindutva by Janaki Bakhle. Princeton, 501 pp., £38, April 2024 https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v47/n01/raghu-karnad/sacred-geography) in his confusing review of Janaki Bakhle’s book Savarkar and the Making of Hindutva by Janaki Bakhle. Princeton, 501 pp., £38, April 2024 , other than that he had to read it in secrecy (I confess I faced no threat). But what does he want us to understand about his subject Savarkar , & his relevance today? Just to make this simple: a dozen years ago I wrote an essay about Savarkar (https://www.threeessays.com/product/fascism-essays-on-europe-and-india/) where I described how he began a movement to harness a national sense of defeat after the crushing of the 1857...
Make a Desert & Call it Peace, or Cognitive Dissonance Declaring that “justice has been served,” Vice President Kamala Harris said on Thursday that the killing of Yahya Sinwar , the Hamas leader whom she called the “mastermind” of the Oct. 7 terrorist attack on Israel, created an opportunity to end the war in Gaza ( https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/17/us/politics/harris-yahya-sinwar-hamas-israel-gaza.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare ) Surely this is cognitive dissonance : for how does America not see how the world sees it? How apt Tacitus’ expression describing the Roman subjugation of Britain, “They make a desert, & call it peace!” As it is remembered, though it might be better translated as “they make a solitude, & call it peace” (for that supposed speech by the Scottish chief Galgacus, that Tacitus’ biography of his father in law Gnaeus Julius Agricola who had governed Britain, recounts as beginning “Whenever...
Yale's actions and the rule of law, Kannan Srinivasan, March 12th 2025
ReplyDeleteIn suspending Helyeh Doutaghi, an eminent Palestinian legal scholar,
because an artificial intelligence-directed website https://jewishonliner.org/p/member-of-us-designated-terror-group had termed her a terrorist https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/12/us/yale-suspends-scholar-terrorism.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare (on the claims inter alia that she had been present at public gatherings where terrorists so designated were also present and also that terrorists so designated had interviewed her and that what she had said was replayed at gatherings of terrorists so designated)
-- without even giving her the right to be heard –
Yale seems to have adopted the extraordinary legal technology pioneered by India, namely that audi alteram partem is simply not necessary.
In a statement Tuesday, Yale Law School described the allegations against Dr. Doutaghi as reflecting “potential unlawful conduct.”
“We take these allegations extremely seriously and immediately opened an investigation into the matter to ascertain the facts,” said the statement, issued by Alden Ferro, a spokesman for Yale Law.
This of course coincidentally follows at least in part the rule of the felicitously named “Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (sic)” of 1967 of India as amended in 2008 and in 2019, which allow an individual to be designated as a terrorist, and the ratio of the Ahmad Shah Watali case, https://digiscr.sci.gov.in/view_judgment?id=MTI3MDk= by the Supreme Court of India, that what the National Investigative Agency said must be presumed to be true and the burden of proof lay on the accused therefore to disprove allegations rather than that guilt must be proven at all.
Section 43D(5) in The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 says at (5) that Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code, no person accused of an offence punishable under Chapters IV and VI of this Act shall, if in custody, be released on bail or on his own bond unless the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity of being heard on the application for such release:Provided that such accused person shall not be released on bail or on his own bond if the Court, on a perusal of the case diary or the report made under section 173 of the Code is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation against such person is prima facie true.
See also The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act 2008: Repeating Past Mistakes
Author(s): South Asia Human RIghts Documentation Centre and Ravi Nair
Source: Economic and Political Weekly, Jan. 24 - 30, 2009, Vol. 44, No. 4 (Jan. 24 - 30,
2009), pp. 10-14
https://kannan-ny.blogspot.com/2024/05/httpsnepf.html?sc=1741807115515#c2281384477743277046
ReplyDelete